Julie Pastikova vs Angelica Raggi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the performance on second serves in recent months, Pastikova has managed to secure 39.69% of the points, slightly edging out Raggi, who has won 37.64%. This statistic is crucial in forecasting match outcomes given its significant correlation to prediction accuracy.

In terms of returning serves, Pastikova demonstrates superiority with 52.55% success on opponents' second serves, compared to Raggi's 46.43%. Additionally, first serve return statistics further confirm Pastikova's advantage, registering 37.61%, slightly ahead of Raggi's 36.31%. These figures are instrumental in determining the likely favorite in their head-to-head matchups.

Both players exhibit varying levels of resilience under pressure. With Raggi saving 44.14% of breakpoints and Pastikova at 40.43%, it illustrates their ability to handle crucial moments, a critical factor for in-game predictions. Yet, in transforming breakpoints into breaks, Pastikova again holds a slight edge, converting 44.3% of opportunities compared to Raggi's 42.11%.

Reviewing their win-loss records over the last year, Pastikova emerges as the more formidable competitor by clinching 65% of her matches (13 wins vs. 7 losses), whereas Raggi has won 48.84% (21 wins vs. 22 losses). This performance overview gives Pastikova a favorable position in the matchup prediction.

When considering surface preferences, Raggi excels on hard courts with a career win rate of 64% (95 wins, 53 losses), while her performance on indoor hard surfaces drops to 40% (2 wins, 3 losses). In contrast, Pastikova's best statistics come from clay courts, boasting a 50% win rate (6 wins, 6 losses), while she struggles more on indoor hard surfaces with only 33% victories (1 win, 2 losses).

Both competitors have largely participated in the Challenger/ITF circuit over the past year, with Raggi securing a 53.13% win rate (17 wins, 15 losses) and Pastikova winning 66.67% of such matches (12 wins, 6 losses). The event level at which they've competed provides context to their relative success.

Facing a different quality of opponents, Raggi's average adversary ranked at 368.49, whereas Pastikova's was significantly stronger at an average rank of 232.95. This difference is pivotal in evaluating their relative accomplishments and readiness for higher competition.

In matches that stretch to a deciding set, Pastikova maintains an edge by winning 50% of those sets in the past year, as opposed to Raggi’s 45%. This endurance factor contributes to assessing who might prevail in prolonged encounters.

When synthesizing these factors, Pastikova stands out as the probable winner. Her consistent superiority across multiple statistics, including second serve returns, breakpoint conversion, match win rate, and her ability to manage high-pressure situations, solidifies her as the favorite in this upcoming tennis match.